Document Type : Review Article


Department of Chemistry, University of Wah, Quaid Avenue, Wah Cantt. (47040), Punjab, Pakistan


Pesticides are helping to meet up the demand for population growth in today's agriculture. They are also being utilized for numerous issues including domestic pests control, home gardening, and disease vectors. Though, they are extremely poisonous in nature. They also cast false impact on surroundings. When used for the agricultural purpose, their toxic residues are continually left behind, and thus forming a major origin of pollution. The unwanted risky chemical groups are contaminating natural assets at a shocking rate. Agricultural pesticides left behinds are among the most harmful contaminants to the soil and water. Removing them from wastewaters is critical as they have bioaccumulation potential, toxicity, and a high persistence. Pesticides have long been used to improve manufacturing efficiency and extend the shelf-life of food goods. Their residues should be removed from food products and waters to limit human pesticide exposure. To remove pesticides, various processes are usually employed which include the adsorption process, membrane processes, and improved oxidation reactions, while microorganisms degrade them naturally i.e. bioremediation/biodegradation. Many organic and inorganic materials have been fabricated for rapid and complete degradation of pesticides. Semiconductor materials contribute to the pesticide oxidation and reduction because they have a proclivity for producing radicals through the charge separation. This review focuses on the pesticides’ taxonomy, functioning, their associated risks to human and environment, and degradation methods involving the current discoveries and progress in the utilization of several approaches for their probable removal from wastewater. The advanced oxidation, adsorption, bioremediation, photocatalysis, semiconductor materials, phytoremediation, and membrane technologies are some of these processes discussed in this investigation. In the upcoming researches, it will be required to generate the novel concepts in the current farming that will reduce the need of toxic pesticides and enable manufacturing of selective to target and less persistent pesticides.

Graphical Abstract

Pesticides’ Taxonomy, Functioning, Their Associated Risks to Human and Environment, and Degradation Technologies


Main Subjects

  1. Introduction

A chemical substance in any state that adds into atmosphere and causes its excellence to lower to such a point that atmosphere may not function properly is called as pollutant [1-2]. The environmental pollution is caused by pollutants produced from nature, and then alter by human actions both directly/indirectly [3]. Human activities that include the constant use of chemicals that are not suitable to environment causes pollution of environment components thus causes the environmental deterioration, and hence poses the potential risk to the living things [4]. Air pollution is mainly caused by fossil fuel burning, industrial productions, volatile gases leaking from interior decorations, and vehicle traffic [5]. These gases are poisonous and acidic in nature and causes the ecosystem damage [6]. They affect human health and climate [7]. Also they cause respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, corrosion of construction material, and poles melting. Water pollution is often caused by the industrial effluents, fertilizers, and pesticides applied to the agricultural lands or from sewage [8]. These all leads to fresh water scarcity, plant eutrophication, aquatic system pollution, and hazards to human health [9]. In soil, the excess of toxic substances changes the soil health, and thus effects crop, sinks [10], and mammalian health  [11]. Soil pollution is usually caused by the industrial waste, agrochemicals, and heavy metals [12].

Agrochemicals include pesticides. These pesticides are widely used in agriculture. Around 80% to 90% of agrochemicals that are practical to crops strike the unintentional targets and can also move from the treated region to any other sites and sully environment. Farmers often lack technical handling of pesticides and their safety aspects. However, they have only the conventional understanding of pesticides [13]. Rapid urbanization and overpopulation leads to increase food production. Therefore, pesticides intake has increased [14].

Pesticide residues cause’s harmful effects to human health such as birth defects, infertility, damages in central nervous system and immune systems, disorders of endocrine, gene mutations, and include causes of cancer [15-17]. Conversely, certain pests controlled by pesticides change their status, become resistant or resurgent. Soil, a significant common asset supporting the endurance and improvement of individuals, is an essential asset for vegetation on earth. Soil is the greatest sink to the natural contaminations [18]. Also, farmland soil is a vital piece of horticultural biological system. Subsequently, the harvests nature and food handling is firmly connected with nature of soil that is consequently identified with human well-being [19]. Soils are the most fundamental piece in biological systems, might be sullied by organic and inorganic contaminations including pesticide [20]. The conventional farming is the main issue that causes environmental pollution because it involves the use of fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides to produce various products or to protect plants. However, the inaccurate dosage and inefficient application causes mistake in agrochemical usage [21]. The excessive usage of nitrogen containing fertilizers causes increase in the amount of pest and disease (due to the imbalance of nutrients) [22]. Due to fertilizers and domestic waste disposal directly to the plants causes increase in amount of phosphor in soil and ground water which act as a major barrier of nutrients. A small amount of phosphate and nitrogen will help sustain life of water plants such as algae. Soil pollution causes the ground water pollution as both are in inseparable area. Polluting substances from soil get dissolved into groundwater. Pesticide residue can become a part of food chain and causes harmful effects to the living organisms that consume them. Contamination can also occur due to the hazardous material that moves through the flow of water, spread by wind or through organisms being exposed to the agrochemicals [22].

Water is the main source of life on earth, and it is highly contaminated with pesticide and industrial pollutants [23]. Water is abundant, but its abundance is limited by certain factors: (i) 97% of total water is sea water also 2/3 of 3% remaining is immobilized, (ii) water is not equally distributed and land is also unequally populated, and (iii) water got polluted due to human activities and causes pollution in water bodies when discharged [24]. Therefore, solution of water scarcity is a major concern. Therefore, water treatment is highly needed to diminish the hazards on human health and environment. Figure 1 displays the pesticides consumption worldwide in the last nine years [25].

Figure 1. Worldwide utilization of pesticides in the last 9 years

  1. Pesticides Taxonomy

The pesticides taxonomy is according to chemical nature, target organism, and origin [26]. Pesticides are usually grouped according to their chemical formulation in major families that include Organochlorine (OC) (Figure 2), Organophosphates (OP) (Figure 3), Carbamates (Figure 4), Carbanilates and Pyrethroids (Figure 5), Acylanalides, Benzonitriles, Benzoic acid derivatives, Dipyrids, Phthalimides (Figure 6), Triazines, Acetamides, Toluidines, Phenoxy alkanoates, and Benzonitriles. Pesticides are also categorized upon their target organism: they may be insecticide, herbicide (Figure 7), rodenticide, fumigants, fungicide, or insect repellent [27]. Pesticides may be naturally occurring or prepared in industries. They include the types of pesticides indicated in Figures 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7.

Figure 2. Organochlorine pesticides

Organochlorine (OC) pesticides are highly toxic and are cancer causing, [28] estrogenic, and resistant to biodegradation [26, 21]. They also cause bio-accumulation [29]. OCs are chlorinated hydrocarbons used in agriculture and mosquito control [30]. They have 10 to 30 years half-life. They are soluble in lipids, stores inside the animal fatty tissue, and then passed down the food chain, harmful for many species, and prolonged relentless. Many countries of different continents have banned OC pesticides, but they are present in environment due to their high perseverance [31]. German chemists developed organophosphorous pesticides (OPPs), during World War (II). Organic solvents and water are solvents for OPPs. They are less persistent than chlorinated hydrocarbons in infiltrating and reaching groundwater, and some of them harm the NS. Plants absorb them, transfers them to leaves and stems, where they are fed to leaf-eating insects. OPPs are used as an alternative to the OC pesticides for controlling insects in fruits, vegetables, and grains around the globe. OPPs and carbamates are still used due to their relative low cost, low persistence, and wide applicability. They act by inhibiting acetylcholinesterase enzyme, and thus disturb the central nervous system of human and insects. Nearly 80% of hospitalization related to pesticides toxicity in humans is due to the OPPs exposure [32]. The use of OPPs became a major issue in the field of environmental chemistry. The OPPs residues in soil not only effect non-target organisms [33], but also disturb equilibrium in ecology of pesticide degrading microorganisms [13,34]. Their residue could be found on supplies and water bodies due to the broad use and high resistance to degradation. Moreover, their transformation byproduct can be a major shock on human health. Toxicity, bioaccumulation, and long-term effects are the factors of pesticides effecting environment. OPPs are found to be dangerous on human life owing to their mutagenic, teratogenic, and carcinogenic effects. Several diseases are linked with OPPs such as Lymphoma and Parkinson’s disease. OPPs have a harmful effect on nervous system as they have insecticidal and nematicidal actions credited to anti-acetylcholinesterase. OPPs represent a large portion of world insect-killer utilization. OPPs reduce fertility in human being by decreasing the testosterones level. They are also responsible for behavioral problems in children and involved in immune problems in human and animals [35]. Intelligent quotients (IQ) of children are damaged by an organophosphate insecticide known as Chlorpyrifos. Benfuracarb damaged human cell and called as cytotoxic. Hypothyroidism is caused by pesticides which are ant cholinesterase [20]. Carbamate acid derivatives are highly poisonous to vertebrates and destroy a limited range of insects.

Figure 3. Organophosphate pesticides

Persistence is relatively low. Pyrethroids are obtained from the natural origin. They are derived from pyrethrins which are natural ester containing chrysanthemum. They have low toxicity and long environmental stability. They have long half-life than natural form. They have an effect on NS, they have short-life than other pest control chemicals, and often utilized as the household insecticides.

  1. Functioning of Pesticides

Upon knowing working method of pesticide, one can find its effects on target or non-target organism [36]. Here, the working mechanism of three types of pesticides is discussed: insecticides, fungicide, and herbicides.

Pesticides according to their action can act as insecticides, which act on acetylcholine receptor, voltage-gated sodium ion channel, and acetylcholinestrase enzyme present in nervous system (NS) [37]. Insecticides show inhibition to acetylcholinesterase, and thus causes overstimulation in NS (e.g., carbamates and OPPs) [38]. Some insecticides attach to the receptor of neurotransmitter (i.e. acetylcholine), and kill insect due to the long lasting stimulation (such as neonicotinoid pesticides) [39]. The OCs insecticides inhibit GABA (gamma-amino butyric acid) receptor, and thus regulate chloride channel. Pyrethroid insecticides get attach with sodium gates and causes tremor and ultimately death in insects. Certain insecticides act as hormones and block chitin production inside insects and kill insect at very initial developmental stage (embryonic development). Endocrine system that is responsible for growth in organisms gets affected by insecticides. Aliphatic OCs insecticides hinder electron transport channels in insects, and thus energy supply is broken. ATP that is the energy currency in an organism is blocked by blocking mitochondrial electron transport chains, and thus death of insect happens. This kind of action is performed by organoinseticides [40].

Cell membrane of fungi consists of ergosterol. Fungicides block ergosterol synthesis such as canazole fungicides [41]. Benzimidazoles fungicides inhibit proteins synthesis in fungi and mammals by affection reassembly of spindle microtubule [41, 42]. Fungicides also affect targeted fungi from multiple sides and different processes occurring in cells [43]. These processes involve the disturbance of redox reaction in cells and restrain respiration [44-46]. They also inhibit signal flow [47].

Figure 4. Carbamate pesticides

Herbicides are used as a replacement to the mechanical methods for the removal of weeds [48]. Growth regulating herbicides are useful for the broad leaf weeds. For seedling growth inhibition thiocarbamates and acid amides are used [46]. As they inhibit growth of plants at root and shoot. Plant metabolic pathway is disturbed by herbicides containing highly active components that interact with biomembranes [49]. Herbicides are also capable of blocking lipid production. Glyphosate suppresses the formation of amino acids (mainly tryptophan, tyrosine, and phenylalanine) [50]. Glyphosate is an active constituent of roundup herbicides. Cartenoids that are photosynthetic pigments protects chlorophyll from damaging. Cartenoids get blocked by clomazone herbicides.

  1. Ways of Degrading Pesticides

Despite the large benefits of pesticides, their accumulation in food makes them highly harmful for humans and environment. Pesticide residues found in food are as active ingredients, their breakdown products or their metabolites have severe damaging effect on human health. The intake of various pesticides has various risks behind. Not only ingestion, but only the exposure to pesticides effects human heath e.g., pesticides sprays effect spray workers. When pesticides residues are consumed they start to store in human tissues and causes the muscle weakness, disorder endocrine secretions, paralysis, and respiratory problems [32]. To avoid the potential exposure of pesticides to human, pesticides residue should be removed from foodstuff and ground water; efficient strategies should be developed to degrade pesticides. The alternative tools to pesticides are IPM (integrated pest management), ICP (integrated crop management), the organic farming, and the sustainable agricultural control. Remediation of soil includes ex-situ, in-situ, and on-site methods. Ex-situ includes dig of soil and treated after transporting to another location. On-site method includes treatment of soil on-site after excavation. In-situ method involves treatment of soil without excavation. The selection of method is based upon pesticide distribution in soil either localized or distributed. Several methods are designed to degrade and get rid of pesticides due to their harmful nature. These methods include bioremediation [51], phytoremediation [52], electrokinetic remediation, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), photolysis [53], photocatalysis [54], hydrogen-peroxide based methods [55], photochemical oxidation [56], adsorption, membrane filtration, and through microorganisms [51, 56-57]. Due to the ease and economically cheap approach, adsorption is the most accepted method [30]. Bioremediation decreases the pesticide defilement of soils by improving characteristic biodegradation measures by means of metabolic exercises of microorganisms, and it is getting well-known for being a productive, practical, and climate amicable in-situ treatment.

Figure 5. Pyrethroid and Carbanilate pesticides

4.1 Bioremediation

Biological method of remedy, also called bioremediation, is a capable skill that converts hydrocarbon containing compounds completely into the low poisonous end products like carbon dioxide or water. In contrast to the other techniques of pollutant removal, bioremediation is economic and beneficial to the environment. There are few types of bioremediation with microorganisms: remediation by native microorganisms, biological augmentation i.e. by using nonnative microorganisms, and also hereditarily tailored microorganisms [58]. Biological stimulation involves the nutrients increment or addition in e- acceptors. Hydrocarbon pollutants can be degraded by various native microbes found in water and soil [59]. Bacteria [60], fungi, and archaea are the most common bio-agents that can disinfect a location [61]. The bacterial genus pseudomonas is considered effective at degrading a wide range of pollutants [62]. It has a 90-99 percent degrading capacity. Microbes having resistance gene to the pollutant usually stay alive in the polluted environment [63]. Microbes use pollutant for food, decompose it, or grow bio-mass. Because these microbes do not keep or accumulate the pesticide, this aids in the decontamination of the area. The biological technology includes biological remediation of soil for maintaining the environmental equilibrium and stability.

4.2 Phytoremediation

Plant absorbs CO2 gas and releases oxygen gas. Rhizosphere microorganisms degrade interacting volatile organic compounds [64]. Leaf adsorption helps in the atmospheric particulates absorption. Plants also help in absorption of the insoluble salt precipitations formed in soil due to the combination of heavy metals with soils and sediments. Wetland is the transition zone between the aquatic and terrestrial ecosystem. It recycles nutrients, treat wastewater, and get rid of poisonous compounds, chemicals, and toxic metals [65]. Phytoremediation is sustainable due to these characteristics of soils. It also reinforces the reduction oxidation processes linking microorganisms present in rhizosphere and flora. Plants also remove nitrogen and phosphorous content from water and helps in the eutrophication reduction of the aquatic ecosystem. For example, Litmus and Aspen removes nitrogen and phosphorous at the removal rate of 40-90% and 75-99%, respectively [12]. The microorganisms of rhizosphere remedy for PCBs, pyrene, decabromodiphenyls, phenanthrene, toxic metals, and dioxins have been described in several investigations. The employment of a mixture of microbial strains with species of plants has brought remediation to forefront. For POPs polluted soils treatment [65-67], microorganisms and phytoremediation are coupled [68, 69].

Figure 6. Phthalimides and miscellaneous pesticides

4.3 Electrokinetic method of soil flushing

Electrokinetic (EK) method of soil flushing is used for cleaning up soils that have been contaminated with various toxins [70]. The polluted soil can get rid of contaminants when passed through fluid flushing, and then treated/mobilized by electrokinetic methods like electro-osmosis, electromigration, and electrophoresis between anodes and cathodes in the presence of electric field [71, 72]. The EK procedure for treatment of contaminated soils has been integrated with the other techniques for decontamination like biological remediation or permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) [73]. Soil treatment that is impure by organic insoluble compounds, researchers are increasingly focusing on combining approaches for treatment, e.g., the EK remediation coupled with the biological PRBs. Soils polluted by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and heavy metals are treated by coupling ultrasound-assisted soil washing and bio-augmentation. To eliminate polybrominated diphenyl ethers from soils a microcosm was achieved by using a TCFR (tourmaline catalyzed Fenton-like reaction) joint to TCFR+P (Phanerochaete chrysosporium). Nanoparticle based remediation (i.e. iron nanoparticles (0)) joint to EK was used.

Figure 7. Common types of herbicides

4.4 Advanced oxidation methods

For wastewater and water treatment, the advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have been employed involving the radical production during the reaction to degrade contaminants (Figure 8). Hydroxyl (OH) radicals are great oxidizing agents and they are not selective in attacking. This makes the basis of the advanced oxidation methods. Hydroxyl (OH) radicals have 2.8 V reduction potential which is significantly greater than other oxidizing agents. Hydroxyl radicals are commonly and widely accepted, indicating the ability to oxidize a lot of compounds during water treatment. Ozone with hydrogen peroxide, peroxone, UV with hydrogen peroxide, Ozone with UV, titanium dioxide photocatalysis, Fenton, Photo Fenton, Ultrasound, hydrodynamic cavitation, and persulfate processes are among the most commonly studied advanced oxidation processes. The process parameters, water quality, and radical scavengers all influence radical formation, attack, and degradation efficiency during reaction. Radicals like hydroxyl radical have a short half-life and react quickly to produce the other reaction products. Singlet oxygen radical, O2, or peroxone radical are produced as by-products. During AOPs including radicals, complete destruction, and mineralization of target, the organic contaminants is achievable. The ability to completely mineralize organics into carbon dioxide and water is one of the AOPs advantages. Complete mineralization may result in no waste sludge production based on reaction conditions and the oxidation process employed. A single oxidation process can be used to de-contaminate a lot of target contaminants in the complicated combinations. AOPs are non-selective while degrading contaminants i.e. they are capable of refractory compounds degradation, excellent efficiency, and efficiency to degrade a variety of DOM (dissolved organic matter). The cost of reagents and processes are relatively greater when using AOPs on a wide scale. In ozonation, ozone is used to degrade organic pollutants. With an oxidation potential of 2.07 V, it has a high oxidation potential. When alkaline circumstances, UV radiation, or transition metal catalysts are used to activate ozone, the production of great reactive radicals (hydroxyl and hydroperoxyl) occur that destroy contaminants readily. Hydrogen peroxide has 1.77 V oxidation potential and its operation is not much useful. Hence, it is usually employed coupled as the AOPs strategy. The hydroxyl radical is generated via titanium dioxide photocatalysis or the UV assisted titanium dioxide photocatalysis, FeSO4, or ozone activation, it improves the efficiency for degradation. Although, the utilized activation method is determined by the contaminants presence and the characteristics of the solution [74, 75], organic pollutants have also been observed to be degraded via cavitation based accelerated oxidation. Significant characteristics of cavitation process include ability to oxidize at room temperature, the utilization of diverse cavitating device configurations, and the suppleness of their joint with AOPs. Once more, the solitary operation of cavitation is never believed to be successful, and thus oxidant joining has been required, so increase in deterioration degree can be achieved [76]. The ultrasound-induced cavitation also produces hydroxyl radicals, which aid in the breakdown or oxidation of pollutants [77]. The ultrasound-induced cavitation has been used to degrade numerous organic molecules and pollutants such as trichlorophenol and rhodamine B, similar to microwave [76]. The inclusion of a catalyst or oxidants is further predicted to improve the efficacy of sonochemical treatment. Microwave-based oxidation technologies have a lot of promise for degrading pollutants in wastewater. Microwaves do not have enough ability for bond breakage, particularly of surfactant like chemicals, but combining them with other degrading materials like oxidizing agents that are able to increase absorption of microwave radiations, induce hotspot and can produce radicals, hence result in intensity in degradation. Microwaves are able to speed up the reactions with effects (including thermal or other) and they have sparked curiosity in microwave-assisted techniques such as ruining of contaminants and wastewater treatment [78].

Figure 8. Reactor, tools, catalysts, radical production, and chemicals combined to give different types of AOPs. Numerous combinations of the aforementioned sorts of processes are feasible, with the potential for the synergy between them. The e-/current assisted AOPs uses electrodes and redox reactions are referred to as e-AOPs. Catalysts are used in c-AOPs, and physical approaches are utilized in p-AOPs to increase the radicals’ formation.

4.5 Photocatalysis

Certain chemical reaction proceeds by absorbing photon or light in certain wavelength in the range of ultraviolet or visible region (10 nm-750 nm). Light absorption depends on the structure of compound and location of double bond. Electrons in the valence band absorb photons and excite to conduction band. Due to the electron excitation, a positive charged hole is generated on the valence band in place of electron. This excited electron may join hole after some times or it may produce a radical, after reduction, on surface of compound. Photoreactions are speed up by the presence of catalyst called as photocatalyst, and such acceleration is called photocatalysis [79]. It is an approach to photochemical detoxification. Mostly, semiconductors are used as photocatalyst. Photocatalyst can be defined as a substance than can produce the chemical transformation of reactants upon absorbing photons and can attain the original chemical composition after each interaction with reaction participants. It is efficient in stoichiometric amounts. Hence, photocatalysis can be defined as “an alternation in time of a reaction or start of a reaction on interaction with UV, visible, IR radiations in the photocatalyst presence, which is responsible for the light absorption and transformation of reactants.” Photocatalysis is employed in organic synthesis, water, and air decontamination and hydrogen production [24]. Photocatalyst used in decontamination of air and water are classified in two groups; semiconductors and organic compound and their complexes with metals. Semiconductor photocatalyst are used in heterogeneous photocatalysis. In photocatalysis, electron promotion causes charge separation between conduction and valence band which then helps in radical formation. For degradation of organic pollutants involving photocatalysis, the radicals’ formation, for example, superoxide radicals (O2) or hydroxyl radical (OH) is necessary. These radicals are essential for organic compounds degradation because they act as electron transport channel from photocatalyst to organic compound. Hydroxyl radical is produced by water oxidation through hole, also produced from hydrogen peroxide due to its interaction with light or other superoxide radicals. The excited electrons in the conduction band reduce oxygen molecule results in the superoxide formation. Reduced oxygen species are produced as indicated in the following equations steps:

4.6 Semiconductor based photocatalyis

AOPs are divided into two categories: homogeneous AOPs and heterogeneous AOPs. When phase of sample is different to catalyst, the heterogeneous AOP can be used to remove pesticides. Photocatalysis based on semiconductors is a low-cost heterogeneous AOP [80]. Semiconductor based photocatalysis has following benefits; cost-effectiveness, non-toxicity, proficient light absorbance, and extended life without a significant photocatalytic pastime [81]. Under the solar/UV irradiation, photocatalytic semiconductors such as ZnO and TiO2 are commonly employed for pesticide breakdown [82]. The TiO2 semiconductor is less hazardous, less expensive, and has been indicated as effective catalyst to degrade poisonous compounds [81]. On the other hand, the Eg value of TiO2 i.e. 3.2eV, results in electron-hole pairs recombination, ineffective adsorption, and limited recovering ability afterward degradation are limitations that restrict its commercial potential [83]. ZnO, a semiconductor with a band gap similar to TiO2, is also utilized as a photocatalyst [84]. The results achieved by using ZnO provide excellent satisfaction in terms of high-scale water treatment, environmental pollution removal, and toxic organic species detoxification. In addition, ZnO has a broad band gap in UV and also recombination is fast. As a result, the created active charge carriers aggregate very quickly, slowing down the reaction rate. The photocatalytic breakdown of pesticides is also aided by the CuO semiconductor. Catalytic potential of semiconductors decreases over time because of recombination and adsorption capacity decreases. The alternative ways for overcoming these constraints take account of doping of metal or non-metal in semiconductor, mixing the semiconductor in other partly-conductor with a dissimilar value of band gap, and creating any composite material that has compounds (dual/ternary) [85-87].

4.7 Adsorption

For polluted soils treatment, principle of adsorption is employed using in-situ amendments and considered as an economic solution. Biochar is a popular modification that is both environmentally beneficial and includes the broad spectrum sources of raw materials [88]. Porous carbon containing solid made by without oxygen pyrolyzing of biomass is called biochar [89]. Biochar is most commonly used as a soil additive to minimize irrigation, enhance its quality, increase rate of crop output, less emissions of greenhouse gas and fertilizer needs. Two major factors, surface area and porosity, influence biochar's sorption capacity for organic contaminants such as pesticides [90]. Higher sorption capabilities will arise from more porous materials and more surface area. The sorption capacity of biochar is dependent on presence of amide, carboxylic (–COOH), lactonic, hydroxyl (–OH), and amine groups on surface. The amount of these groups on surface of biochar is influenced by two important factors: pyrolysis temperature and source material [90-93]. The alkali catalysis mechanism in biochar can speed up the OP insecticide hydrolysis and carbamate insecticides hydrolysis in the soil [94]. Biochar  is alkaline, in general, and its pH rises as the pyrolysis temperature rises. However, depending on the source material, there are a few exceptions, for example, biochar made through sludge of wastewater or straw obtained from wheat relatively on low temperatures i.e. 400 °C was acidic in nature (pH 4.87-6.11). Functional groups are essential elements impacting biochar's pesticide sorption capabilities, and aromatic structure is also important for biochar's long-term behavior in the soil. In fact, the pyrolysis temperature determines the majority of biochar features, and the ratio of hydrocarbons reflects structure of the aromatic compound present that can also determines size of pores and surface area of adsorbent. Concerning the treated biochars for soils remedy, it is necessary considering if treatment processes are economic or not, albeit they have a good sorption ability [95]. In addition, biochar found as an effective pesticide amendment for its sorption ability which is able to reduce the biological degradation of pesticides within soils. In contrast, a lot of microbial stimulation can be caused by biochars making a high microbial degradation of pesticides. Consequently, the dominant action of biochar determines its effect of on biodegrading pesticides [96].

4.8 Membrane filtration

Separation systems based on membranes (pressure assisted) offer a great removal aptitude, economic, and operational flexibility, the membrane’s material is available feasibly and energy consumption is low [97, 98]. Membrane methods, on the other hand, are plagued by the production of cake layers, which eventually block pores of membrane and make it dirty. The significant reductions in water flux, increase in energy consumption, and cost of treatment are fouling aftermaths [99]. Furthermore, the membrane dependent filtering methods focus contaminants keen on high-concentration remains, which should be treated further before final discharge.

Pesticide residues cause’s harmful effects to human health that is mentioned in Table 1.

Table 1. Representative studies on different pesticides

  1. Conclusion

Pesticides are used to boost crop yield, prevent vector illnesses, and kill, or inhibit dangerous pests. On the other hand, they have the unmistakable negative consequences. Destruction of water and soil quality harmfully affects the environment inhabitant because they are considerably affecting the environment and mammals. Biodiversity get affected by pesticides and their contact either directly or indirectly but on long-term basis pose the solemn health risks for human beings. Cancer, abnormality in reproduction, diabetes mellitus, illnesses of respiration, and problems of neurology are just some of the acute health concerns they might cause. To remediate the polluted ecosystem, various remediation approaches have been documented, including adsorption, biological remediation, AOPs, and so on. Adsorption and biological remediation, on the other hand, are mentioned to be the ideal treatments since they are ecologically benign, economically effective, and produce less harmful byproducts. To lessen the risk of pesticide poisoning, governments should work together. By enacting the rigorous legislation and toxicity standards, the necessary steps should be done to ensure the efficient management of pesticides. The integrated pest management (IPM) can aid with pesticide use plus control of chemicals. Manufacturing of pesticides should include more care and a higher safety profile to have a lower detrimental influence on the environment and humans.


The authors are thankful to the University of Wah, Quaid Avenue, Wah Cantt for providing us research and technical facilities.


Zakira tullah

Qurat ul Ain

Fawad Ahmad

Citation: Z. tullah, Q. ul Ain, F. Ahmad*, Pesticides’ Taxonomy, Functioning, Their Associated Risks to Human and Environment, and Degradation Technologies. J. Chem. Rev., 2023, 5(1), 31-55.

[1] M. G. Keuten, F. M. Schets, J. F. Schijven, J. Q. Verberk, and J. C. van Dijk, Definition quantification of initial anthropogenic pollutant release in swimming pools, Water Research, 2012, 46, 3682-3692. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[2] M. Murcia-Morales, F. J. Diaz-Galiano, F. Vejsnaes, O. Kilpinen, J. J. M. Van der Steen, A. R. Fernandez-Alba, Environmental monitoring study of pesticide contamination in Denmark through honey bee colonies using APIStrip-based sampling, Environmental Pollution, 2021, 290, 117888. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[3] S. R. Conrad, S. A. White, I. R. Santos, C. J. Sanders, Assessing pesticide, trace metal, and arsenic contamination in soils and dam sediments in a rapidly expanding horticultural area in Australia, Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2021, 43, 3189-3211. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[4] S. Ben Mukiibi et al., Organochlorine pesticide residues in Uganda’s honey as a bioindicator of environmental contamination and reproductive health implications to consumers, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2021, 214, 112094. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[5] W. Benka-Coker, L. Hoskovec, R. Severson, J. Balmes, A. Wilson, S. Magzamen, The joint effect of ambient air pollution and agricultural pesticide exposures on lung function among children with asthma, Environmental Research, 2020, 190, 109903. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[6] L. Guo, A. Cao, M. Huang, H. Li, Effects of haze pollution on pesticide use by rice farmers: fresh evidence from rural areas of China, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28, 62755-62770. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[7] D. A. M. Alexandrino, C. M. R. Almeida, A. P. Mucha, M. F. Carvalho, Revisiting pesticide pollution: The case of fluorinated pesticides, Environmental Pollution, 2021, 292, 118315. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[8] C. Grimene, O. Mghirbi, S. Louvet, J. P. Bord, P. Le Grusse, Spatial characterization of surface water vulnerability to diffuse pollution related to pesticide contamination: case of the Gimone watershed in France, Environmental Science and Pollution Research volume, 2021, 29, 17-19. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[9] C. Postigo et al., Investigative monitoring of pesticide and nitrogen pollution sources in a complex multi-stressed catchment: The lower Llobregat River basin case study (Barcelona, Spain), Science of The Total Environment, 2021, 755, 142377. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[10] A. Sybertz et al., Simulating spray series of pesticides in agricultural practice reveals evidence for accumulation of environmental risk in soil, Science of The Total Environment, 2020, 710, 135004. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[11] R. G. I. Sumudumali, J. Jayawardana, S. Malavipathirana, E. P. N. Udayakumara, S. K. Gunatilake, Correction to: A review of biological monitoring of aquatic ecosystems approaches: with special reference to macroinvertebrates and pesticide pollution, Environmental Management, 2021, 67, 1016. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[12] Z. Wei et al., A review on phytoremediation of contaminants in air, water and soil, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 403, 123658. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[13] [13] L. Thredgold, S. Gaskin, C. Quy, D. Pisaniello, Exposure of agriculture workers to pesticides: The effect of heat on protective glove performance and skin exposure to dichlorvos, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16, 4798-4809. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[14] M. Lykogianni, E. Bempelou, F. Karamaouna, K. A. Aliferis, Do pesticides promote or hinder sustainability in agriculture? The challenge of sustainable use of pesticides in modern agriculture, Science of The Total Environment, 2021, 795, 148625. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[15] L. Utyasheva M. Eddleston, Removing highly hazardous pesticides from Indian agriculture will reduce suicides, The National Medical Journal of India, 2018, 31, 317-318. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[16] L. Bondareva N. Fedorova, Pesticides: Behavior in agricultural soil and plants, Molecules, 2021, 26, 5370-5385. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[17] X. Wang, Q. Z. Zhang, G. F. Zhao, X. Y. Wang, Distribution characteristics and risk assessment of soil organochlorine pesticides in the submerged zone of the reservoir, Huan Jing Ke Xue, 2019, 40, 3058-3067. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[18] A. P. Ogura, J. Z. Lima, J. P. Marques, L. Massaro Sousa, V. G. S. Rodrigues, E. L. G. Espindola, A review of pesticides sorption in biochar from maize, rice, and wheat residues: Current status and challenges for soil application, Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 300, 113753. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[19] S. F. Cui et al., Transfer characteristic of fluorine from atmospheric dry deposition, fertilizers, pesticides, and phosphogypsum into soil, Chemosphere, 2021, 278, 130432. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[20] S. Sun, V. Sidhu, Y. Rong, Y. Zheng, Pesticide pollution in agricultural soils and sustainable remediation methods: a review, Current Pollution Reports, 2018, 4, 240-250. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[21] A. W. Tadesse, Occurrences, Potential Sources and Health Impacts of Organochlorine Pesticides in Soil from Wuhan, Central China, Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2021, 107, 296-311. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[22] E. Panjaitan, L. Sidauruk, D. Indradewa, E. Martono, J. Sartohadi, Impact of agriculture on water pollution in Deli Serdang Regency, North Sumatra Province, Indonesia, Organic Agriculture, 2020, 10, 419-427. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[23] A. Pena, L. Delgado-Moreno, J. A. Rodriguez-Liebana, A review of the impact of wastewater on the fate of pesticides in soils: Effect of some soil and solution properties, Science of The Total Environment, 2020, 718, 134468. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[24] M. L. Marin, L. Santos-Juanes, A. Arques, A. M. Amat, M. A. Miranda, Organic photocatalysts for the oxidation of pollutants and model compounds, Chemical Reviews, 2012, 112, 1710-1750. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[25] FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations. [Publisher]
[26] V. P. Dremova, The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of pesticides by hazard, Med Parazitol (Mosk), 2011, 3, 53-54. [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[27] P. Banjare, J. Singh, P. P. Roy, Predictive classification-based QSTR models for toxicity study of diverse pesticides on multiple avian species, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28, 17992-18003. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[28] V. S. Turusov, V. N. Rakitskii, Classification of pesticides according to carcinogenicity to man, Vopr Onkol, 1997, 43, 299-303. [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[29] H. Yu, Y. Liu, X. Shu, L. Ma, Y. Pan, Assessment of the spatial distribution of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in urban soil of China, Chemosphere, 2020, 243, 125392. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[30] M. Rani, U. Shanker, V. Jassal, Recent strategies for removal and degradation of persistent & toxic organochlorine pesticides using nanoparticles: A review, Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 190, 208-222. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[31] R. Jayaraj, P. Megha, P. Sreedev, Review Article. Organochlorine pesticides, their toxic effects on living organisms and their fate in the environment, Interdisciplinary Toxicology, 2016, 9 ,90-100. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[32] S. Narenderan, S. Meyyanathan, B. Babu, Review of pesticide residue analysis in fruits and vegetables. Pre-treatment, extraction and detection techniques, Food Research International, 2020, 133, 109141. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[33] J. Muhire, S. S. Li, B. Yin, J. Y. Mi, H. L. Zhai, A simple approach to the prediction of soil sorption of organophosphorus pesticides, Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B, 2021, 56, 606-612. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[34] J. Kaushal, M. Khatri, S. K. Arya, A treatise on Organophosphate pesticide pollution: Current strategies and advancements in their environmental degradation and elimination, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2021, 207, 111483. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[35] A. Prieto, D. Molero, G. González, I. Buscema-Arteaga, G. Ettiene, D. Medina, Persistence of Methamidophos, Diazinon, and Malathion in Tomatoes, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology, 2002, 69, 479-485. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[36] P. Schreinemachers et al., Too much to handle? Pesticide dependence of smallholder vegetable farmers in Southeast Asia, Science of The Total Environment, 2017, 593-594, 470-477. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[37] Y. Rajashekar, N. Tonsing, T. Shantibala, J. R. Manjunath, 2, 3-Dimethylmaleic anhydride (3, 4-Dimethyl-2, 5-furandione): A plant derived insecticidal molecule from Colocasia esculenta var. esculenta (L.) Schott, Scientific Reports, 2016, 6, 20546-20553. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[38] K. Zhang et al., Multiresidue pesticide analysis of agricultural commodities using acetonitrile salt-out extraction, dispersive solid-Phase sample clean-up, and high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2011, 59, 7636-7646. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[39] T. Sunita, L. Min, X. Hui, Acetylcholinesterase: A primary target for drugs and insecticides, Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry, 2017, 17,1665-1676. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[40] B. C. Mirjana, Z. K. Danijela, D. L.-P. Tamara, M. B. Aleksandra, M. V. Vesna, Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors: Pharmacology and txicology, Current Neuropharmacology, 2013, 11, 315-335. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[41] T. C. Sparks, R. Nauen, IRAC: Mode of action classification and insecticide resistance management, Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2015, 121, 122-128. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[42] C. Aponte, T. Marañón, L. V. García, Microbial C, N and P in soils of Mediterranean oak forests: influence of season, canopy cover and soil depth, Biogeochemistry, 2010, 101, 77-92. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[43] J. F. Carr, S. T. Gregory, A. E. Dahlberg, Severity of the Streptomycin resistance and Streptomycin dependence phenotypes of ribosomal protein S12 of thermus thermophilus depends on the identity of highly conserved amino acid residues, Journal of Bacteriology, 2005, 187, 3548-3550. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[44] J. E. Casida, K. A. Durkin, Pesticide chemical research in toxicology: Lessons from nature, Chemical Research in Toxicology, 2017, 30, 94-104. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[45] V. Lushchak, H. Semchyshyn, O. Lushchak, S. Mandryk, Diethyldithiocarbamate inhibits in vivo Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase and perturbs free radical processes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2005, 338, 1739-1744. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[46] P. H. Thrall et al., Evolution in agriculture: the application of evolutionary approaches to the management of biotic interactions in agro-ecosystems, Evolutionary Applications, 2011, 4, 200-215. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[47] P. M. White, T. L. Potter, A. K. Culbreath, Fungicide dissipation and impact on metolachlor aerobic soil degradation and soil microbial dynamics, Science of The Total Environment, 2010, 408, 1393-1402. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[48] F. Torrens, G. Castellano, Molecular classification of pesticides including persistent organic pollutants, phenylurea and sulphonylurea herbicides, Molecules, 2014, 19, 7388-414. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[49] N. Sathiakumar, P. A. MacLennan, J. Mandel, E. Delzell, A review of epidemiologic studies of triazine herbicides and cancer, Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 2011, 41, 1-34. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[50] J. V. Tarazona et al., Response to the reply by C. J. Portier and P. Clausing, concerning our review “Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC”, Archives of Toxicology, 2017, 91, 3199-3203. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[51] H. Malhotra, S. Kaur, P. S. Phale, Conserved Metabolic and Evolutionary Themes in Microbial Degradation of Carbamate Pesticides, Frontiers in Microbiology, 2021, 12, 648868-648899. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[52] J. Kaushal, P. Mahajan, N. Kaur, A review on application of phytoremediation technique for eradication of synthetic dyes by using ornamental plants, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28, 67970–67989. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[53] N. Zhu et al., Photo-degradation behavior of seven benzoylurea pesticides with C3N4 nanofilm and its aquatic impacts on Scendesmus obliquus, Science of The Total Environment, 2021, 799, 149470. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[54] Y. Xu, M. M. Hassan, S. Ali, H. Li, Q. Ouyang, Q. Chen, Self-Cleaning-Mediated SERS Chip Coupled Chemometric Algorithms for Detection and Photocatalytic Degradation of Pesticides in Food, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2021, 69,  1667-1674. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[55] I. L. C. Cunha, A. Teixeira, Degradation of pesticides present in tomato rinse water by direct photolysis and UVC/H2O2: optimization of process conditions through sequential Doehlert design, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28, 24191-24205. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[56] Y. Bai, J. Chen, Y. Yang, L. Guo, C. Zhang, Degradation of organophosphorus pesticide induced by oxygen plasma: Effects of operating parameters and reaction mechanisms, Chemosphere, 2010, 81, 408-414. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[57] S. Yuan, C. Li, H. Yu, Y. Xie, Y. Guo, W. Yao, Selective uptake determines the variation in degradation of organophosphorus pesticides by Lactobacillus plantarum, Food Chemistry, 2021, 360, 130106. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[58] N. Laothamteep, K. Naloka, O. Pinyakong, Bioaugmentation with zeolite-immobilized bacterial consortium OPK results in a bacterial community shift and enhances the bioremediation of crude oil-polluted marine sandy soil microcosms, Environmental Pollution, 2021, 292, 118309. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[59] Z. Ahsan, U. Kalsoom, H. N. Bhatti, K. Aftab, N. Khalid, M. Bilal, Enzyme-assisted bioremediation approach for synthetic dyes and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons degradation, Journal of Basic Microbiology, 2021, 61, 960-981. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[60] R. Deng et al., A critical review of resistance and oxidation mechanisms of Sb-oxidizing bacteria for the bioremediation of Sb(III) pollution, Frontiers in Microbiology, 2021, 12, 738596. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[61] S. R. David, V. A. Geoffroy, A review of asbestos bioweathering by siderophore-producing pseudomonas: A potential strategy of bioremediation, Microorganisms, 2020, 8, 1870. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[62] S. Vieto, D. Rojas-Gatjens, J. I. Jimenez, M. Chavarria, The potential of Pseudomonas for bioremediation of oxyanions, Environmental Microbiology Reports, 2021, 13, 773-789. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[63] A. Mehta, K. K. Bhardwaj, M. Shaiza, R. Gupta, Isolation, characterization and identification of pesticide degrading bacteria from contaminated soil for bioremediation, Biologia Futura, 2021, 72, 317-323. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[64] D. A. M. Alexandrino, A. P. Mucha, C. M. R. Almeida, M. F. Carvalho, Atlas of the microbial degradation of fluorinated pesticides, Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 2021, 42, 991-1009. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[65] G. Riaz et al., Phytoremediation of organochlorine and pyrethroid pesticides by aquatic macrophytes and algae in freshwater systems, International Journal of Phytoremediation, 2017, 19, 894-898. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[66] T. Singh, D. K. Singh, Phytoremediation of organochlorine pesticides: Concept, method, and recent developments, International Journal of Phytoremediation, 2017, 19, 834-843. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[67] S. R. Rissato et al., Evaluation of ricinus communis L. for the phytoremediation of polluted soil with organochlorine pesticides, Biomed Res Int, 2015,  549863. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[68] A. Nurzhanova, V. Pidlisnyuk, S. Kalugin, T. Stefanovska, M. Drimal, Miscanthus x giganteus as a new highly efficient phytoremediation agent for improving soils contaminated by pesticides residues and supplemented contaminants, Communications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences, 2015, 80, 361-366. [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[69] A. Nurzhanova, T. Mukasheva, R. Berzhanova, S. Kalugin, A. Omirbekova, A. Mikolasch, Optimization of microbial assisted phytoremediation of soils contaminated with pesticides, International Journal of Phytoremediation, 2021, 23, 482-491. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[70] B. S. Ramadan, G. L. Sari, R. T. Rosmalina, A. J. Effendi, Hadrah, An overview of electrokinetic soil flushing and its effect on bioremediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soil, Journal of Environmental Management, 2018, 218, 309-321. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[71] E. V. dos Santos et al., Application of electrokinetic soil flushing to four herbicides: A comparison, Chemosphere, 2016, 153, 205-211. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[72] C. Risco et al., Removal of oxyfluorfen from spiked soils using electrokinetic soil flushing with the surrounding arrangements of electrodes, Science of The Total Environment, 2016, 559, 94-102. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[73] E. Mena, C. Ruiz, J. Villasenor, M. A. Rodrigo, P. Canizares, Biological permeable reactive barriers coupled with electrokinetic soil flushing for the treatment of diesel-polluted clay soil, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2014, 283, 131-139. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[74] A. Fernandes, P. Makoś, Z. Wang, G. Boczkaj, Synergistic effect of TiO2 photocatalytic advanced oxidation processes in the treatment of refinery effluents, Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 391, 123488. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[75] G. Boczkaj, A. Fernandes, Wastewater treatment by means of advanced oxidation processes at basic pH conditions: A review, Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 320, 608-633. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[76] M. Gągol, A. Przyjazny, G. Boczkaj, Wastewater treatment by means of advanced oxidation processes based on cavitation–A review, Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 338, 599-627. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[77] V. K. Saharan, A. B. Pandit, P. S. Satish Kumar, S. Anandan, Hydrodynamic cavitation as an advanced oxidation technique for the degradation of acid red 88 dye, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012, 51, 1981-1989. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[78] P. S. Bhandari, B. P. Makwana, P. R. Gogate, Microwave and ultrasound assisted dual oxidant based degradation of sodium dodecyl sulfate: Efficacy of irradiation approaches and oxidants, Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2020, 36, 101316. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[79] K. R. Flores, Photocatalytic degradation of simazine using ZnO/GO composites, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, 2018, 10976904. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[80] M. Jiménez et al., Supported TiO2 solar photocatalysis at semi-pilot scale: degradation of pesticides found in citrus processing industry wastewater, reactivity and influence of photogenerated species, Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 2015, 90, 149-157. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[81] J. H. Kim, J. H. Kim, Triplet–triplet annihilation-based upconversion in the aqueous phase for sub-band-gap semiconductor photocatalysis, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2012, 134, 17478-17481. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[82] I. Garrido et al., Photocatalytic performance of electrospun silk fibroin/ZnO mats to remove pesticide residues from water under natural sunlight, Catalysts, 2020, 10, 110. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[83] H. Masoumbaigi, A. Rezaee, H. Hosseini, S. Hashemi, Water disinfection by zinc oxide nanoparticle prepared with solution combustion method, Desalination and Water Treatment, 2015, 56, 2376-2381. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[84] H. Zeng et al., ZnO-Based Hollow Nanoparticles by Selective Etching: Elimination and Reconstruction of Metal−Semiconductor Interface, Improvement of Blue Emission and Photocatalysis, ACS Nano, 2008, 2, 1661-1670. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[85] L. Zhi et al., Photocatalysis-based nanoprobes using noble metal–semiconductor heterostructure for visible light-driven in vivo detection of mercury, Analytical Chemistry, 2017, 89, 7649-7658. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[86] B. Weng, Y. J. Xu, What if the electrical conductivity of graphene is significantly deteriorated for the graphene–semiconductor composite-based photocatalysis?, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2015, 7, 27948-27958. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[87] A. Pattanaik, S. K. Tripathy, P. Naik, D. K. Meher, Structural and elastic properties of binary semiconductors from energy gaps, Applied Physics A, 2021, 127, 14. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[88] E. Agrafioti, D. Kalderis, E. Diamadopoulos, Ca and Fe modified biochars as adsorbents of arsenic and chromium in aqueous solutions, Journal of Environmental Management, 2014, 146, 444-450. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[89] R. Acosta, V. Fierro, A. Martinez de Yuso, D. Nabarlatz, A. Celzard, Tetracycline adsorption onto activated carbons produced by KOH activation of tyre pyrolysis char, Chemosphere, 2016, 149, 168-176. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[90] H. Li, X. Dong, E. B. da Silva, L. M. de Oliveira, Y. Chen, L. Q. Ma, Mechanisms of metal sorption by biochars: Biochar characteristics and modifications, Chemosphere, 2017, 178, 466-478. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[91] Z. Chen, X. Xiao, B. Chen, L. Zhu, Quantification of chemical states, dissociation constants and contents of oxygen-containing groups on the surface of biochars produced at different temperatures, Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49, 309-317. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[92] Y. Han, X. Cao, X. Ouyang, S. P. Sohi, J. Chen, Adsorption kinetics of magnetic biochar derived from peanut hull on removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solution: Effects of production conditions and particle size, Chemosphere, 2016, 145, 336-341. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[93] Y. Liu, S. Yao, Y. Wang, H. Lu, S. K. Brar, S. Yang, Bio- and hydrochars from rice straw and pig manure: Inter-comparison, Bioresource Technology, 2017, 235, 332-337. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[94] Z. Ding, X. Hu, Y. Wan, S. Wang, B. Gao, Removal of lead, copper, cadmium, zinc, and nickel from aqueous solutions by alkali-modified biochar: Batch and column tests, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2016, 33, 239-245. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[95] H. Deng, D. Feng, J.-x. He, F.-z. Li, H.-m. Yu, C.-j. Ge, Influence of biochar amendments to soil on the mobility of atrazine using sorption-desorption and soil thin-layer chromatography, Ecological Engineering, 2017, 99, 381-390. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[96] Y. Liu, L. Lonappan, S. K. Brar, S. Yang, Impact of biochar amendment in agricultural soils on the sorption, desorption, and degradation of pesticides: A review, Science of The Total Environment, 2018, 645, 60-70. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[97] R. Farhadi, M. A. Aroon, A. Ebrahimian Pirbazari, M. Safarpour, T. Matsuura, P. Seirafi, Simultaneous separation and degradation of methylene blue by a thin film nanocomposite membrane containing TiO2/MWCNTs nanophotocatalyst, Environmental Technology, 2021, 1-16. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[98] J. H. Jhaveri, Z. V. P. Murthy, A comprehensive review on anti-fouling nanocomposite membranes for pressure driven membrane separation processes, Desalination, 2016, 379, 137-154. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[99] A. Mudhoo, A. Bhatnagar, M. Rantalankila, V. Srivastava, M. Sillanpää, Endosulfan removal through bioremediation, photocatalytic degradation, adsorption and membrane separation processes: A review, Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 360, 912-928. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[100] C. Zhu et al., Rapid DDTs degradation by thermally activated persulfate in soil under aerobic and anaerobic conditions: Reductive radicals vs. oxidative radicals, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 402, 123557. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[101] D. Borello et al., Use of microbial fuel cells for soil remediation: A preliminary study on DDE, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46, 10131-10142. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[102] P. Gulipalli, T. Punugoti, P. Nikhil, V. Rao Poiba, M. Vangalapati, Synthesis and characterization of Ni/Zn dually doped on multiwalled carbon nanotubes and its application for the degradation of dicofol, Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021, 44, 2760-2766. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[103] S. Khan, M. Sohail, C. Han, J. A. Khan, H. M. Khan, D. D. Dionysiou, Degradation of highly chlorinated pesticide, lindane, in water using UV/persulfate: kinetics and mechanism, toxicity evaluation, and synergism by H2O2, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 402, 123558. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[104] A. Shankar, M. Kongot, V. K. Saini, A. Kumar, Removal of pentachlorophenol pesticide from aqueous solutions using modified chitosan, Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 2020, 13, 1821-1830. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[105] S. Vigneshwaran, P. Sirajudheen, P. Karthikeyan, M. Nikitha, K. Ramkumar, S. Meenakshi, Immobilization of MIL-88(Fe) anchored TiO2-chitosan(2D/2D) hybrid nanocomposite for the degradation of organophosphate pesticide: Characterization, mechanism and degradation intermediates, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 406, 124728. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[106] Y. Vasseghian, F. Almomani, V. T. Le, M. Moradi, E.-N. Dragoi, Decontamination of toxic Malathion pesticide in aqueous solutions by Fenton-based processes: Degradation pathway, toxicity assessment and health risk assessment, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2022, 423, 127016. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[107] Q. Yang et al., Interface engineering of metal organic framework on graphene oxide with enhanced adsorption capacity for organophosphorus pesticide, Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 313, 19-26. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[108] P. Nasiripur, M. Zangiabadi, M. H. Baghersad, Visible light photocatalytic degradation of methyl parathion as chemical warfare agents simulant via GO-Fe3O4/Bi2MoO6 nanocomposite, Journal of Molecular Structure, 2021, 1243, 130875. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[109] X. Deng, R. Chen, Z. Zhao, F. Cui, X. Xu, Graphene oxide-supported graphitic carbon nitride microflowers decorated by sliver nanoparticles for enhanced photocatalytic degradation of dimethoate via addition of sulfite: Mechanism and toxicity evolution, Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 425, 131683. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[110] F. Li et al., Carbaryl biodegradation by Xylaria sp. BNL1 and its metabolic pathway, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2018, 167, 331-337. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[111] D. Mohanta, M. Ahmaruzzaman, Facile fabrication of novel Fe3O4-SnO2-gC3N4 ternary nanocomposites and their photocatalytic properties towards the degradation of carbofuran, Chemosphere, 2021, 285, 131395. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[112] R. Kattiparambil Manoharan, S. Sankaran, Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutant aldicarb by non-metal-doped nanotitania: synthesis and characterization, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25, 20510-20517. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[113] Y. P. Bhoi, B. G. Mishra, Photocatalytic degradation of alachlor using type-II CuS/BiFeO3 heterojunctions as novel photocatalyst under visible light irradiation, Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 344, 391-401. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[114] J. Cai, M. Zhou, X. Du, X. Xu, Enhanced mechanism of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid degradation by electrochemical activation of persulfate on Blue-TiO2 nanotubes anode, Separation and Purification Technology, 2021, 254, 117560. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[115] J. E. L. Santos, D. C. de Moura, M. Cerro-López, M. A. Quiroz, C. A. Martínez Huitle, Electro- and photo-electrooxidation of 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxiacetic acid (2,4,5-T) in aqueous media with PbO2, Sb-doped SnO2, BDD and TiO2-NTs anodes: A comparative study, Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2020, 873, 114438. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[116] U. Kumari, T. Banerjee, N. Singh, Evaluating ash and biochar mixed biomixtures for atrazine and fipronil degradation, Environmental Technology & Innovation, 2021, 23, 101745. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[117] M. Lojo-López, J. A. Andrades, A. Egea-Corbacho, M. D. Coello, J. M. Quiroga, Degradation of simazine by photolysis of hydrogen peroxide Fenton and photo-Fenton under darkness, sunlight and UV light, Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2021, 42, 102115. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[118] S. Vigneshwaran, J. Preethi, S. Meenakshi, Interface engineering of ultrathin multi-functional 2D draped chitosan for efficient charge separation on degradation of paraquat ‒ A mechanistic study, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2020, 8, 104446. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[119] X. Liang et al., Surface hydroxyl groups functionalized graphite carbon nitride for high efficient removal of diquat dibromide from water, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2021, 582, 70-80. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[120] M. Tharmavaram et al., Chitosan functionalized Halloysite Nanotubes as a receptive surface for laccase and copper to perform degradation of chlorpyrifos in aqueous environment, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules,2021, 191, 1046-1055. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]